Friday, September 18, 2009

Comments on CWC

the following point must be taken for discussion.
Authorising IP/ASP for doing RPLI busines just like authorising PA/Postman for doing PLI business. If this is done, the loss of PLI business supposed to be procurred by IP/ASP but not due to the authorisation of PA/Postman will be set right. SOme body should raise this in the CWC.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

yes. this point has to be discussed in the CWC. We should show our protest for authorising the PA/Postman for doing PLI business which in turn affect our business/They are doing only PLI business and not concentrating on their own duties. But in our case we after doing all our works only concentrating on the PLI business. This should be discussed. N Prakash, IP WLJ Sub DIvision.

Anonymous said...

Another point may also be taken for discussion friends. Regarding exchange of the PM post of TV Malai HO for Deputy PM post Vellore HO or PM, Ranipet HO/Arakkonam HO/Arni HO. N Prakash, IP, Walajapet SUb Division, TN

Anonymous said...

we should take action for stopping authorising PM/PA for PLI business. Instead thsy should be authorised for RPLI business

All ASPs & IPs are requested to update Member Database in Right pane